https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168210 The Court held that the charging of capitation fee for admissions to educational institutions is arbitrary, unfair, and violates Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court declared that the right to education is implicit under the Constitution and charging capitation fee denies this right. The notification permitting capitation fee was found to be beyond the scope of the Act and violative of the provisions prohibiting capitation fee. Consequently, paragraphs allowing capitation fee collection were quashed. The writ petition was allowed with no order as to costs, and existing students admitted under the notification were not affected. en-us Thu, 30 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Feb 2015 10:24:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168210 The Court held that the charging of capitation fee for admissions to educational institutions is arbitrary, unfair, and violates Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court declared that the right to education is implicit under the Constitution and charging capitation fee denies this right. The notification permitting capitation fee was found to be beyond the scope of the Act and violative of the provisions prohibiting capitation fee. Consequently, paragraphs allowing capitation fee collection were quashed. The writ petition was allowed with no order as to costs, and existing students admitted under the notification were not affected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 30 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168210