<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 84 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256084</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD dismissed the applications for condonation of delay, leading to the dismissal of the stay petitions and appeals due to the lack of bona fide reasons presented for the 406-day delay in filing appeals before the Bench. The appellant&#039;s grounds were deemed unconvincing, and despite the confirmation of the demand, the Tribunal found no justifiable reasons for the delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2015 06:05:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 84 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256084</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD dismissed the applications for condonation of delay, leading to the dismissal of the stay petitions and appeals due to the lack of bona fide reasons presented for the 406-day delay in filing appeals before the Bench. The appellant&#039;s grounds were deemed unconvincing, and despite the confirmation of the demand, the Tribunal found no justifiable reasons for the delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>