https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256081 The judgment upheld the appellant's right to request retesting from a different laboratory due to doubts raised about the accuracy of the initial test report provided by CRCL. The impugned order was set aside, directing retesting by a laboratory other than CRCL. It was also ruled that the bank guarantee should not be encashed until the adjudication process concluded. The importance of accurate testing of imported goods and the right of importers to seek retesting from alternative laboratories when necessary was emphasized in this decision. en-us Mon, 19 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Feb 2015 06:04:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256081 The judgment upheld the appellant's right to request retesting from a different laboratory due to doubts raised about the accuracy of the initial test report provided by CRCL. The impugned order was set aside, directing retesting by a laboratory other than CRCL. It was also ruled that the bank guarantee should not be encashed until the adjudication process concluded. The importance of accurate testing of imported goods and the right of importers to seek retesting from alternative laboratories when necessary was emphasized in this decision. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 19 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256081