https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256075 The court allowed exemption for the appeal, condoning the delay in filing it. The appeal challenged the order of attachment of properties under PMLA, 2002, with the court finding merit in the appellant's contentions regarding the interpretation of the Act. The impugned order was set aside, directing the Appellate Authority to decide the appeal against the attachment order within eight weeks. Both parties were to appear before the Authority for further arguments if needed, ensuring timely disposal of the appeal. en-us Tue, 13 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Dec 2016 17:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256075 The court allowed exemption for the appeal, condoning the delay in filing it. The appeal challenged the order of attachment of properties under PMLA, 2002, with the court finding merit in the appellant's contentions regarding the interpretation of the Act. The impugned order was set aside, directing the Appellate Authority to decide the appeal against the attachment order within eight weeks. Both parties were to appear before the Authority for further arguments if needed, ensuring timely disposal of the appeal. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 13 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256075