<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 74 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256074</link>
    <description>Writ jurisdiction was found unsuitable for disputes that would alter contractual supply terms between dealers and oil companies, particularly where contractual and statutory remedies were available and the agreements were not produced. The challenge to sale and supply of petroleum products in litres also failed because the Legal Metrology framework recognises litre as a permitted unit of volume, including for liquid measurement under the relevant rules and schedules. On both maintainability and merits, the writ petitions were dismissed and the appeals failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2015 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 74 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256074</link>
      <description>Writ jurisdiction was found unsuitable for disputes that would alter contractual supply terms between dealers and oil companies, particularly where contractual and statutory remedies were available and the agreements were not produced. The challenge to sale and supply of petroleum products in litres also failed because the Legal Metrology framework recognises litre as a permitted unit of volume, including for liquid measurement under the relevant rules and schedules. On both maintainability and merits, the writ petitions were dismissed and the appeals failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>