https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168208 Railway seniority in a cadre filled by direct recruits, in-service graduate clerks and promotees was governed by the applicable seniority rule and para 302, so inter se rank depended on regular appointment and joining after due process, with promotees ranking above direct recruits where the rule so provided. In-service graduate clerks appointed after 1 October 1980 could not claim retrospective pro forma seniority or monetary benefits from that date; benefits accrued only from actual appointment to the grade. Ad hoc appointees made dehors the rules could not count their initial engagement for seniority and ranked only from regular selection and appointment under the prescribed process. en-us Tue, 12 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Feb 2015 14:02:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168208 Railway seniority in a cadre filled by direct recruits, in-service graduate clerks and promotees was governed by the applicable seniority rule and para 302, so inter se rank depended on regular appointment and joining after due process, with promotees ranking above direct recruits where the rule so provided. In-service graduate clerks appointed after 1 October 1980 could not claim retrospective pro forma seniority or monetary benefits from that date; benefits accrued only from actual appointment to the grade. Ad hoc appointees made dehors the rules could not count their initial engagement for seniority and ranked only from regular selection and appointment under the prescribed process. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168208