<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (10) TMI 295 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168204</link>
    <description>Temporary appointees appointed under Rule 10(a)(i)(l) of the Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules could not claim seniority over Public Service Commission-selected direct recruits because their appointments were emergency appointments made outside the recruitment rules. Seniority had to be reckoned from appointment made in accordance with the rules, and temporary or ad hoc service rendered dehors the rules could not be counted to outrank regularly selected candidates. Regularisation under Rule 23(a) did not confer an earlier seniority date, and the direction placing the temporary appointees below the 1981 PSC batch correctly applied the service rules without offending Articles 14 and 16.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 12:57:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (10) TMI 295 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168204</link>
      <description>Temporary appointees appointed under Rule 10(a)(i)(l) of the Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules could not claim seniority over Public Service Commission-selected direct recruits because their appointments were emergency appointments made outside the recruitment rules. Seniority had to be reckoned from appointment made in accordance with the rules, and temporary or ad hoc service rendered dehors the rules could not be counted to outrank regularly selected candidates. Regularisation under Rule 23(a) did not confer an earlier seniority date, and the direction placing the temporary appointees below the 1981 PSC batch correctly applied the service rules without offending Articles 14 and 16.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>