<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 51 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256051</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made towards the enhanced value of the land owned by the firm. The Tribunal emphasized that the valuation of the land should have been done in accordance with specific rules under the Wealth Tax Act 1957, rather than using arbitrary methods. The decision highlighted the importance of valuing business assets like land based on the prescribed rules, ultimately leading to the deletion of the additional amount in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2015 10:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 51 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256051</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made towards the enhanced value of the land owned by the firm. The Tribunal emphasized that the valuation of the land should have been done in accordance with specific rules under the Wealth Tax Act 1957, rather than using arbitrary methods. The decision highlighted the importance of valuing business assets like land based on the prescribed rules, ultimately leading to the deletion of the additional amount in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>