<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 50 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256050</link>
    <description>The Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013 permits disclosure of tax dues only where the second proviso to section 106(1) is not attracted. The proviso bars a declaration when the same issue has already been covered by an earlier notice or determination, even if the declaration relates to a later period. On the facts described, the earlier show cause notice and the declaration both concerned short-payment of service tax on GTA, Maintenance &amp; Repair Service and BAS, so the statutory embargo applied. The rejection was based on the section 106(1) bar, not on suppression under section 111. The declaration was therefore not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 50 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256050</link>
      <description>The Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013 permits disclosure of tax dues only where the second proviso to section 106(1) is not attracted. The proviso bars a declaration when the same issue has already been covered by an earlier notice or determination, even if the declaration relates to a later period. On the facts described, the earlier show cause notice and the declaration both concerned short-payment of service tax on GTA, Maintenance &amp; Repair Service and BAS, so the statutory embargo applied. The rejection was based on the section 106(1) bar, not on suppression under section 111. The declaration was therefore not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>