<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 45 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256045</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit was treated as admissible on service tax paid for outdoor catering, maintenance of lawns and gardens, maintenance of a cycle stand, and upkeep of a guest house, because each service was connected to the factory&#039;s business requirements. Outdoor catering for the canteen was allowed as the canteen facility was mandatory for workers under the Factories Act. Maintenance of lawns and gardens was allowed where it was required by the Pollution Control Board as a condition for operating the factory. Cycle stand maintenance was treated as a necessary worker , and guest house upkeep was accepted as a business necessity due to the factory&#039;s location outside city limits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 11:29:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 45 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256045</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit was treated as admissible on service tax paid for outdoor catering, maintenance of lawns and gardens, maintenance of a cycle stand, and upkeep of a guest house, because each service was connected to the factory&#039;s business requirements. Outdoor catering for the canteen was allowed as the canteen facility was mandatory for workers under the Factories Act. Maintenance of lawns and gardens was allowed where it was required by the Pollution Control Board as a condition for operating the factory. Cycle stand maintenance was treated as a necessary worker , and guest house upkeep was accepted as a business necessity due to the factory&#039;s location outside city limits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>