<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 44 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256044</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the respondent, allowing them to avail Cenvat credit based on the TR-6 challan under Rule 9(1)(e) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal determined that the denial of credit on fraud-related grounds did not apply retroactively, affirming the respondent&#039;s eligibility for the credit despite the detection of the offence case. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, and the respondent&#039;s position was supported by the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 44 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256044</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the respondent, allowing them to avail Cenvat credit based on the TR-6 challan under Rule 9(1)(e) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal determined that the denial of credit on fraud-related grounds did not apply retroactively, affirming the respondent&#039;s eligibility for the credit despite the detection of the offence case. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, and the respondent&#039;s position was supported by the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>