<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 36 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256036</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicants, allowing their Cenvat credit claim and overturning the penalty imposed for lack of endorsement on the Bill of Entries. The judgment highlighted the practical fulfillment of the endorsement requirement, emphasizing the substance of transactions over technicalities in Cenvat credit matters. The Tribunal found the Revenue&#039;s objection unjustified, considering the applicants&#039; receipt of goods, duty paid status, and supporting documentation from importers. The applicants were granted relief without the need for pre-deposit of duty and penalty, with the Tribunal emphasizing the importance of a pragmatic approach in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 21:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 36 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256036</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicants, allowing their Cenvat credit claim and overturning the penalty imposed for lack of endorsement on the Bill of Entries. The judgment highlighted the practical fulfillment of the endorsement requirement, emphasizing the substance of transactions over technicalities in Cenvat credit matters. The Tribunal found the Revenue&#039;s objection unjustified, considering the applicants&#039; receipt of goods, duty paid status, and supporting documentation from importers. The applicants were granted relief without the need for pre-deposit of duty and penalty, with the Tribunal emphasizing the importance of a pragmatic approach in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>