<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 25 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256025</link>
    <description>The Calcutta HC admitted the appeal on the substantial question of law whether discretion was exercised arbitrarily in imposing penalty and redemption fine. It declined interim relief, expedited the hearing, and directed filing of the paper book. The application was disposed of, and the appeal remains pending for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 20:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 25 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256025</link>
      <description>The Calcutta HC admitted the appeal on the substantial question of law whether discretion was exercised arbitrarily in imposing penalty and redemption fine. It declined interim relief, expedited the hearing, and directed filing of the paper book. The application was disposed of, and the appeal remains pending for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>