<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 18 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256018</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order. The court ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues, including the withdrawal of investment allowance and previously granted depreciation, as well as the enhancement of income by the Tribunal. The court held that the conditions for withdrawal of investment allowance were not met, assets depreciated at 100% were not taxable under Section 41(1), and unproven transactions could not justify income enhancement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 11:21:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 18 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256018</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order. The court ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues, including the withdrawal of investment allowance and previously granted depreciation, as well as the enhancement of income by the Tribunal. The court held that the conditions for withdrawal of investment allowance were not met, assets depreciated at 100% were not taxable under Section 41(1), and unproven transactions could not justify income enhancement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>