<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 13 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256013</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 2005-06, modifying the disallowance of expenses and depreciation to only essential expenses for maintaining corporate status. It upheld the classification of service charges and interest income as &#039;Income from Other Sources&#039; and disallowed personal expenditures of directors. The ad-hoc disallowance of director&#039;s remuneration was upheld due to part of it being attributed to rental income. For the assessment year 2008-09, both the assessee&#039;s and Revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, directing a fresh examination by the AO due to revived business activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 11:21:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 13 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256013</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for the assessment year 2005-06, modifying the disallowance of expenses and depreciation to only essential expenses for maintaining corporate status. It upheld the classification of service charges and interest income as &#039;Income from Other Sources&#039; and disallowed personal expenditures of directors. The ad-hoc disallowance of director&#039;s remuneration was upheld due to part of it being attributed to rental income. For the assessment year 2008-09, both the assessee&#039;s and Revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, directing a fresh examination by the AO due to revived business activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>