<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 6 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256006</link>
    <description>ITAT DELHI - AT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of a section 14A disallowance, finding the assessee&#039;s investments in subsidiaries were strategic for running hotels, not made to earn exempt dividends; since the subsidiaries were located outside India any dividend would not have been exempt, the disallowance was dismissed and decided in favour of the assessee. The Tribunal also upheld deletion of a disallowance denying depreciation on the World Trade Centre and World Trade Tower, allowing depreciation as in prior assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 18:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 6 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256006</link>
      <description>ITAT DELHI - AT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of a section 14A disallowance, finding the assessee&#039;s investments in subsidiaries were strategic for running hotels, not made to earn exempt dividends; since the subsidiaries were located outside India any dividend would not have been exempt, the disallowance was dismissed and decided in favour of the assessee. The Tribunal also upheld deletion of a disallowance denying depreciation on the World Trade Centre and World Trade Tower, allowing depreciation as in prior assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>