<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 2 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256002</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and remanded the case to the AO for fresh adjudication regarding the addition of Rs. 20,16,000 to the assessee&#039;s income and the penalty under section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal emphasized the principle of &quot;Audi Alteram Partem&quot; and directed the AO to provide a reasonable opportunity for the assessee to be heard. Both appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 11:20:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 2 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256002</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and remanded the case to the AO for fresh adjudication regarding the addition of Rs. 20,16,000 to the assessee&#039;s income and the penalty under section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal emphasized the principle of &quot;Audi Alteram Partem&quot; and directed the AO to provide a reasonable opportunity for the assessee to be heard. Both appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>