https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168198 Officiating service rendered after an ad hoc promotion against a substantive vacancy was counted for seniority because the appointment was made through the prescribed channel, the employee continued uninterruptedly until regularisation, and the later regularisation did not wipe out the earlier service. The governing seniority rules, as amended in 1967, required promotees and direct recruits appointed in the same calendar year to be ranked accordingly, with promotees placed senior. Review jurisdiction was also held to be narrow: it cannot be used to re-argue the matter, ignore the applicable rules, or rely on an inapposite earlier view. The review order was unsustainable and the original seniority position was restored. en-us Tue, 02 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Jan 2015 15:00:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168198 Officiating service rendered after an ad hoc promotion against a substantive vacancy was counted for seniority because the appointment was made through the prescribed channel, the employee continued uninterruptedly until regularisation, and the later regularisation did not wipe out the earlier service. The governing seniority rules, as amended in 1967, required promotees and direct recruits appointed in the same calendar year to be ranked accordingly, with promotees placed senior. Review jurisdiction was also held to be narrow: it cannot be used to re-argue the matter, ignore the applicable rules, or rely on an inapposite earlier view. The review order was unsustainable and the original seniority position was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168198