https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255999 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order confirming service tax demand, interest, and penalties. The appellant's supervision work did not qualify as Management Consultancy Services, as they were not providing technical assistance or advice to clients. The extended period of limitation was deemed inapplicable due to the absence of allegations of malafide intentions or tax evasion. en-us Thu, 08 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Sep 2015 11:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255999 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order confirming service tax demand, interest, and penalties. The appellant's supervision work did not qualify as Management Consultancy Services, as they were not providing technical assistance or advice to clients. The extended period of limitation was deemed inapplicable due to the absence of allegations of malafide intentions or tax evasion. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 08 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255999