<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1191 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255992</link>
    <description>Laying of paver blocks at a port was analysed for service tax classification and was treated as commercial or industrial construction service rather than business auxiliary service. The activity was held to relate to construction work at the port, falling within the statutory scope of construction and allied services connected with commerce or industry. It was not regarded as service provided on behalf of clients in the manner required for business auxiliary service. On that basis, the article states that the activity was not taxable as business auxiliary service, and the related demand, interest and penalties were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2015 13:08:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1191 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255992</link>
      <description>Laying of paver blocks at a port was analysed for service tax classification and was treated as commercial or industrial construction service rather than business auxiliary service. The activity was held to relate to construction work at the port, falling within the statutory scope of construction and allied services connected with commerce or industry. It was not regarded as service provided on behalf of clients in the manner required for business auxiliary service. On that basis, the article states that the activity was not taxable as business auxiliary service, and the related demand, interest and penalties were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>