<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1191 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255992</link>
    <description>Laying paver blocks at a port falls within commercial or industrial construction service rather than business auxiliary service. The construction-service definition covers construction and allied services connected with commerce or industry, subject to specified exclusions for infrastructure such as roads, airports, railways, transport terminals, bridges, tunnels and dams. Work performed at the port was construction-related and was not a service provided on behalf of clients for business auxiliary service purposes. Consequently, classification under business auxiliary service was inapplicable, and the related service-tax demand, interest and penalties were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2015 13:08:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1191 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255992</link>
      <description>Laying paver blocks at a port falls within commercial or industrial construction service rather than business auxiliary service. The construction-service definition covers construction and allied services connected with commerce or industry, subject to specified exclusions for infrastructure such as roads, airports, railways, transport terminals, bridges, tunnels and dams. Work performed at the port was construction-related and was not a service provided on behalf of clients for business auxiliary service purposes. Consequently, classification under business auxiliary service was inapplicable, and the related service-tax demand, interest and penalties were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>