<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1180 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255981</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s application for condonation of a 739-day delay in filing an appeal regarding Central Excise duty demand, disallowance of Cenvat credit, and penalty. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the appellant&#039;s claim of filing the appeal through a Courier service, leading to the rejection of the delay condonation application and subsequent failure of the appeal. The disallowance of Cenvat credit and penalty were upheld, with the penalty reduced to Rs. 1 lakh due to the absence of evidence indicating an intent to evade duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2015 13:07:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1180 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255981</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s application for condonation of a 739-day delay in filing an appeal regarding Central Excise duty demand, disallowance of Cenvat credit, and penalty. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the appellant&#039;s claim of filing the appeal through a Courier service, leading to the rejection of the delay condonation application and subsequent failure of the appeal. The disallowance of Cenvat credit and penalty were upheld, with the penalty reduced to Rs. 1 lakh due to the absence of evidence indicating an intent to evade duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>