<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1178 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255979</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the tax appeal below Rs. 10 lakh on grounds of maintainability. It addressed issues concerning the burden of proof on seized diamonds and the challenge to the penalty imposed, ultimately favoring the assessee and citing legal precedents to support its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2015 13:06:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1178 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255979</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the tax appeal below Rs. 10 lakh on grounds of maintainability. It addressed issues concerning the burden of proof on seized diamonds and the challenge to the penalty imposed, ultimately favoring the assessee and citing legal precedents to support its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>