https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255975 The High Court allowed the appeal, finding that the Tribunal's imposition of the penalty on both the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) and the appellant separately was not justified. The Court directed the HUF to deposit a specified amount within four weeks, which would result in a waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery concerning the penalty directed against the appellant. Failure to comply would enforce the Tribunal's original direction. en-us Mon, 07 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Jan 2015 13:06:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255975 The High Court allowed the appeal, finding that the Tribunal's imposition of the penalty on both the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) and the appellant separately was not justified. The Court directed the HUF to deposit a specified amount within four weeks, which would result in a waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery concerning the penalty directed against the appellant. Failure to comply would enforce the Tribunal's original direction. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 07 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255975