<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1172 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255973</link>
    <description>The court directed the concerned Commissioner to grant the petitioner a hearing under Regulation 19, scheduling it for a specific date. Following the hearing, the Commissioner must issue a timely order either revoking or confirming the directive to surrender the &#039;G&#039; Card, aligning with Regulation 19(2). Ultimately, the writ petition was allowed, emphasizing the importance of due process and timely decision-making in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2015 13:06:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1172 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255973</link>
      <description>The court directed the concerned Commissioner to grant the petitioner a hearing under Regulation 19, scheduling it for a specific date. Following the hearing, the Commissioner must issue a timely order either revoking or confirming the directive to surrender the &#039;G&#039; Card, aligning with Regulation 19(2). Ultimately, the writ petition was allowed, emphasizing the importance of due process and timely decision-making in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>