https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168196 A right to enter specified parts of a lake, catch fish and carry them away for future periods is a profit a prendre and therefore an interest in immovable property. An oral, unregistered transfer of such a right conveys no title or enforceable proprietary interest where writing and registration are required. The State's refusal to recognise the private contracts did not amount to confiscation, acquisition, or taking possession of property, so there was no deprivation of property and no infringement of Articles 19(1)(f) or 31(1). Any remedy, if available, lay in contract against the proper party, not in constitutional property claims. en-us Thu, 27 Oct 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Jan 2015 11:49:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168196 A right to enter specified parts of a lake, catch fish and carry them away for future periods is a profit a prendre and therefore an interest in immovable property. An oral, unregistered transfer of such a right conveys no title or enforceable proprietary interest where writing and registration are required. The State's refusal to recognise the private contracts did not amount to confiscation, acquisition, or taking possession of property, so there was no deprivation of property and no infringement of Articles 19(1)(f) or 31(1). Any remedy, if available, lay in contract against the proper party, not in constitutional property claims. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 27 Oct 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168196