https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168190 Unsupported reliance on an earlier award, without adequate evidence of land quality, was found insufficient for fixing compensation, so a lower uniform market value was applied to the acquired land. Irrigation features used as part of cultivation, including a tank and a well, were treated as appurtenant to the holding and no separate compensation was payable on the facts found. The additional amount claimed under Section 23(1-A) was also held unsustainable on the temporal basis of the acquisition award, and the enhanced component on that head was disallowed. en-us Thu, 08 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168190 Unsupported reliance on an earlier award, without adequate evidence of land quality, was found insufficient for fixing compensation, so a lower uniform market value was applied to the acquired land. Irrigation features used as part of cultivation, including a tank and a well, were treated as appurtenant to the holding and no separate compensation was payable on the facts found. The additional amount claimed under Section 23(1-A) was also held unsustainable on the temporal basis of the acquisition award, and the enhanced component on that head was disallowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168190