https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168188 Section 104 read with Order 43 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure applies on the original side of a Chartered High Court, so orders made there under the Code remain appealable where the provision so allows. The Letters Patent does not exclude that appellate operation. An order refusing appointment of a receiver or interim injunction can also qualify as a "judgment" under clause 15 when it finally affects a valuable or substantive right and bears the traits of finality in the proceeding. On that approach, an intra-court appeal against refusal of interim relief is maintainable. en-us Mon, 10 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Nov 2015 16:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168188 Section 104 read with Order 43 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure applies on the original side of a Chartered High Court, so orders made there under the Code remain appealable where the provision so allows. The Letters Patent does not exclude that appellate operation. An order refusing appointment of a receiver or interim injunction can also qualify as a "judgment" under clause 15 when it finally affects a valuable or substantive right and bears the traits of finality in the proceeding. On that approach, an intra-court appeal against refusal of interim relief is maintainable. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 10 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168188