<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1145 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255946</link>
    <description>The judge upheld the imposition of penalties on the appellant for delayed payment of service tax, emphasizing the continuous nature of the delays and lack of justification. The appeal was rejected, with the judge concluding that the penalties were rightly imposed due to the non-bona fide nature of the delays and the importance of compliance with tax payment deadlines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2015 08:45:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1145 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255946</link>
      <description>The judge upheld the imposition of penalties on the appellant for delayed payment of service tax, emphasizing the continuous nature of the delays and lack of justification. The appeal was rejected, with the judge concluding that the penalties were rightly imposed due to the non-bona fide nature of the delays and the importance of compliance with tax payment deadlines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>