https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255943 The appellate tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for a detailed re-evaluation. The directions included reconsidering the place of removal concerning the exported goods, assessing the eligibility of CHA services and port services for Cenvat credit, and clarifying any allegations of wilful misstatement or suppression. The order highlighted the significance of a comprehensive analysis to ensure a fair and accurate determination of Cenvat credit eligibility in the context of exported goods. en-us Mon, 02 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Jan 2015 08:44:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255943 The appellate tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for a detailed re-evaluation. The directions included reconsidering the place of removal concerning the exported goods, assessing the eligibility of CHA services and port services for Cenvat credit, and clarifying any allegations of wilful misstatement or suppression. The order highlighted the significance of a comprehensive analysis to ensure a fair and accurate determination of Cenvat credit eligibility in the context of exported goods. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 02 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255943