<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1141 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255942</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit was treated as admissible for export-linked services incurred up to the port, because the port was regarded as the place of removal; Custom House Agent, airport and port services were therefore creditable. Courier, storage and warehousing, maintenance of xerox/fax machines, telephone and security services were also treated as input services on the basis of business nexus and the Rule 2(l) definition. Transport services and the residuary category of other services were not decided finally because the factual record was incomplete and those issues were remanded for fresh consideration. Penalties under the service tax provisions were set aside because the credit dispute did not show mala fides.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2015 08:44:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1141 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255942</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit was treated as admissible for export-linked services incurred up to the port, because the port was regarded as the place of removal; Custom House Agent, airport and port services were therefore creditable. Courier, storage and warehousing, maintenance of xerox/fax machines, telephone and security services were also treated as input services on the basis of business nexus and the Rule 2(l) definition. Transport services and the residuary category of other services were not decided finally because the factual record was incomplete and those issues were remanded for fresh consideration. Penalties under the service tax provisions were set aside because the credit dispute did not show mala fides.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>