<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1133 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255934</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI upheld the demand for differential duty, ruling that duty should be paid on goods cleared directly to consignment agents at the selling price. The penalty on the first appellant was reduced, and the penalty on the second appellant was set aside, acknowledging the correct discharge of duty by the job workers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1133 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255934</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI upheld the demand for differential duty, ruling that duty should be paid on goods cleared directly to consignment agents at the selling price. The penalty on the first appellant was reduced, and the penalty on the second appellant was set aside, acknowledging the correct discharge of duty by the job workers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>