https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255933 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision, setting aside the impugned order. The Tribunal held that the person authorized by the company under a resolution should be considered the "principal officer" for filing appeals, even without specific authorization. The appeal was found maintainable, waiving the pre-deposit requirement, and proceeding for disposal with the consent of both parties. en-us Fri, 13 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255933 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision, setting aside the impugned order. The Tribunal held that the person authorized by the company under a resolution should be considered the "principal officer" for filing appeals, even without specific authorization. The appeal was found maintainable, waiving the pre-deposit requirement, and proceeding for disposal with the consent of both parties. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 13 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255933