https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255929 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand and penalties imposed on the appellant for alleged clandestine removal of excess sugar. It ruled that excess molasses reported did not conclusively prove excess sugar production, emphasizing the need for substantial evidence beyond mere excess molasses for allegations of clandestine activity. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, citing the precedent of Oudh Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Union of India. en-us Wed, 07 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255929 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand and penalties imposed on the appellant for alleged clandestine removal of excess sugar. It ruled that excess molasses reported did not conclusively prove excess sugar production, emphasizing the need for substantial evidence beyond mere excess molasses for allegations of clandestine activity. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, citing the precedent of Oudh Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Union of India. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 07 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255929