<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 544 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168184</link>
    <description>Under Article 2(b) of the Punjab Limitation (Custom) Act, 1920, limitation for a suit for possession runs from the later of the accrual of the right to sue or the date of the declaratory decree. Where an appeal against the declaratory decree later abates, the abatement gives finality to the litigation even though it is not a merits adjudication. On that basis, the decree becomes final only on the date of abatement, and that later date is the relevant starting point for limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2015 19:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 544 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168184</link>
      <description>Under Article 2(b) of the Punjab Limitation (Custom) Act, 1920, limitation for a suit for possession runs from the later of the accrual of the right to sue or the date of the declaratory decree. Where an appeal against the declaratory decree later abates, the abatement gives finality to the litigation even though it is not a merits adjudication. On that basis, the decree becomes final only on the date of abatement, and that later date is the relevant starting point for limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>