https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255901 The court dismissed W.P.No.22355 of 2014, refusing to release Rs. 40,40,000/- seized from the petitioner at the airport as it violated customs regulations. Conversely, W.P.No.22700 of 2014 was allowed, ordering the return of Rs. 7,00,000/- seized from the travel agency's office due to insufficient evidence and infringement of the right to property. The judgment differentiated between the cases based on legal provisions, leading to the contrasting outcomes. en-us Wed, 08 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Jun 2015 12:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255901 The court dismissed W.P.No.22355 of 2014, refusing to release Rs. 40,40,000/- seized from the petitioner at the airport as it violated customs regulations. Conversely, W.P.No.22700 of 2014 was allowed, ordering the return of Rs. 7,00,000/- seized from the travel agency's office due to insufficient evidence and infringement of the right to property. The judgment differentiated between the cases based on legal provisions, leading to the contrasting outcomes. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 08 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255901