<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 904 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168183</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision in a case involving the abatement of an appeal due to delay in bringing on record the legal heirs of deceased respondents. The Court found that the appellants failed to show sufficient cause for the delay, emphasizing the importance of timely action in legal proceedings. The appeal was dismissed, with the Court declining to exercise discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 08:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 904 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168183</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision in a case involving the abatement of an appeal due to delay in bringing on record the legal heirs of deceased respondents. The Court found that the appellants failed to show sufficient cause for the delay, emphasizing the importance of timely action in legal proceedings. The appeal was dismissed, with the Court declining to exercise discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>