<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1097 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255898</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal in part, granting cum tax benefit. However, the reduction of penalty under Section 76 was overturned, restoring the penalty imposed by the adjudicating authority. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 06:37:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1097 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255898</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal in part, granting cum tax benefit. However, the reduction of penalty under Section 76 was overturned, restoring the penalty imposed by the adjudicating authority. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>