<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1090 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255891</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the decision that rough forged rolls should be considered as inputs for Cenvat credit purposes. The tribunal confirmed that the rolls were used in manufacturing specified capital goods, making them eligible for credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules. As the Revenue did not challenge the Commissioner&#039;s findings, the appeal was dismissed, allowing the respondents to claim Cenvat credit on the rough forged rolls.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 06:35:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1090 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255891</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the decision that rough forged rolls should be considered as inputs for Cenvat credit purposes. The tribunal confirmed that the rolls were used in manufacturing specified capital goods, making them eligible for credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules. As the Revenue did not challenge the Commissioner&#039;s findings, the appeal was dismissed, allowing the respondents to claim Cenvat credit on the rough forged rolls.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>