<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1088 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255889</link>
    <description>Prima facie evidence from workers&#039; statements, the premises and recovery of goods supported the revenue&#039;s case, so complete waiver of pre-deposit was not granted. However, the appellant&#039;s rent deed, absence of an inculpatory statement from the appellant, and the need for fuller examination at the final stage justified only partial relief. The appellant was therefore required to make a partial pre-deposit, with waiver of the balance on compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 06:35:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1088 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255889</link>
      <description>Prima facie evidence from workers&#039; statements, the premises and recovery of goods supported the revenue&#039;s case, so complete waiver of pre-deposit was not granted. However, the appellant&#039;s rent deed, absence of an inculpatory statement from the appellant, and the need for fuller examination at the final stage justified only partial relief. The appellant was therefore required to make a partial pre-deposit, with waiver of the balance on compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>