<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1085 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255886</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 56/2002-C.E. remained available where certificates from the Labour Officer and District Industries Centre established that additional investment in plant and machinery increased regular employment by more than 25%; omission of the base employment figure did not defeat the claim. Units located in Gangyal Private Land Industrial Area also fell within the notified area because their khasra numbers were within the notification&#039;s specified range, notwithstanding that those exact numbers were not separately named. The exemption could not be denied on a hyper-technical objection to khasra-number descriptions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 09:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1085 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255886</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 56/2002-C.E. remained available where certificates from the Labour Officer and District Industries Centre established that additional investment in plant and machinery increased regular employment by more than 25%; omission of the base employment figure did not defeat the claim. Units located in Gangyal Private Land Industrial Area also fell within the notified area because their khasra numbers were within the notification&#039;s specified range, notwithstanding that those exact numbers were not separately named. The exemption could not be denied on a hyper-technical objection to khasra-number descriptions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>