<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1056 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255857</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order under Section 263, restored the Assessing Officer&#039;s original order allowing the exemption under Section 54F, and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal held that the construction of multiple residential units within a single building qualifies for deduction under Section 54F, and the Commissioner was not justified in revising the Assessing Officer&#039;s order on this issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 06:31:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1056 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255857</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order under Section 263, restored the Assessing Officer&#039;s original order allowing the exemption under Section 54F, and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal held that the construction of multiple residential units within a single building qualifies for deduction under Section 54F, and the Commissioner was not justified in revising the Assessing Officer&#039;s order on this issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>