<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1050 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255851</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the respondent&#039;s Miscellaneous Applications challenging the maintainability of the appeals, holding that the appeals were filed in compliance with Section 86(2) of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal addressed the delay issue, directing the appellants to compute the exact delay. Emphasizing procedural compliance and the application of mind by the Committee of Chief Commissioners, the Tribunal upheld the appeals&#039; maintainability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1050 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255851</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the respondent&#039;s Miscellaneous Applications challenging the maintainability of the appeals, holding that the appeals were filed in compliance with Section 86(2) of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal addressed the delay issue, directing the appellants to compute the exact delay. Emphasizing procedural compliance and the application of mind by the Committee of Chief Commissioners, the Tribunal upheld the appeals&#039; maintainability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>