<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1046 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255847</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and instructing a reevaluation by the Appellate Tribunal on the limitation period concerning the specified timeframe. The substantial legal questions raised in the appeal were deemed unnecessary for decision due to the remittance of the matter for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 06:40:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1046 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255847</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and instructing a reevaluation by the Appellate Tribunal on the limitation period concerning the specified timeframe. The substantial legal questions raised in the appeal were deemed unnecessary for decision due to the remittance of the matter for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>