<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1037 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255838</link>
    <description>In a dispute over manufacture through job-workers, the Tribunal held that manufacture depends on who converts inputs into a new product with a distinct name, character and use. On the facts, packaged mineral water was manufactured by the job-workers, and supplying bottles, preforms, caps and packing materials did not by itself make the appellant the manufacturer. The appellant was not treated as the manufacturer merely because the job-workers could not freely market the goods or because Notification No. 214/86-CE was not followed in the manner alleged by the department. Complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay against recovery was therefore granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1037 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255838</link>
      <description>In a dispute over manufacture through job-workers, the Tribunal held that manufacture depends on who converts inputs into a new product with a distinct name, character and use. On the facts, packaged mineral water was manufactured by the job-workers, and supplying bottles, preforms, caps and packing materials did not by itself make the appellant the manufacturer. The appellant was not treated as the manufacturer merely because the job-workers could not freely market the goods or because Notification No. 214/86-CE was not followed in the manner alleged by the department. Complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay against recovery was therefore granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>