<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1036 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255837</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and both the stay petition and appeal were disposed of accordingly. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering specific factual contexts in determining interest liabilities on unutilized Central Excise credit amounts, highlighting the relevance of previous judicial interpretations in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 06:36:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1036 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255837</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and both the stay petition and appeal were disposed of accordingly. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering specific factual contexts in determining interest liabilities on unutilized Central Excise credit amounts, highlighting the relevance of previous judicial interpretations in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>