<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1031 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255832</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that spare parts used to replace old machinery parts became part of the machinery, not increasing its value. Therefore, customs duty was not applicable on the spare parts during debonding. The duty payable was based on raw materials and depreciated capital goods&#039; value. The Tribunal found the appellant not guilty of suppressing information and deemed the extended limitation period unjustified. The order demanding customs duty, interest, and penalty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 16:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1031 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255832</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that spare parts used to replace old machinery parts became part of the machinery, not increasing its value. Therefore, customs duty was not applicable on the spare parts during debonding. The duty payable was based on raw materials and depreciated capital goods&#039; value. The Tribunal found the appellant not guilty of suppressing information and deemed the extended limitation period unjustified. The order demanding customs duty, interest, and penalty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>