<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1019 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255820</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed all writ petitions challenging the notification declaring Cyprus as a notified jurisdictional area and the revised certificate issued by the Income Tax Authorities. The court emphasized the availability of statutory appeals as the appropriate remedy for challenging such decisions and directed the parties to follow the legal procedures for further redressal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 06:33:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1019 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255820</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed all writ petitions challenging the notification declaring Cyprus as a notified jurisdictional area and the revised certificate issued by the Income Tax Authorities. The court emphasized the availability of statutory appeals as the appropriate remedy for challenging such decisions and directed the parties to follow the legal procedures for further redressal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>