<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1014 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255815</link>
    <description>The tribunal quashed the assessment due to procedural errors in the reopening process, specifically the lack of approval from the appropriate authority as required by the I.T. Act. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the CIT(A)&#039;s order, along with all additions made by the AO, was invalidated. The tribunal emphasized the significance of complying with statutory requirements for reopening assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 06:32:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=374707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1014 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255815</link>
      <description>The tribunal quashed the assessment due to procedural errors in the reopening process, specifically the lack of approval from the appropriate authority as required by the I.T. Act. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the CIT(A)&#039;s order, along with all additions made by the AO, was invalidated. The tribunal emphasized the significance of complying with statutory requirements for reopening assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>