https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168175 The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of Dr. Saran's petitions challenging the appointment of junior officers as lecturers, finding the appointments in line with State Government practices. Dr. Verma's seniority over Dr. Saran was confirmed based on earlier appointment dates. The State Government's selection criteria, considering merit and experience, were deemed appropriate. Respondents 5 and 6 met the qualifications for lecturer appointments, while Dr. Saran lacked sufficient teaching experience at the time. As Dr. Saran was ineligible for the post, his plea for a mandamus was rejected, and the appeals were dismissed without costs. en-us Fri, 13 Oct 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:11:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168175 The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of Dr. Saran's petitions challenging the appointment of junior officers as lecturers, finding the appointments in line with State Government practices. Dr. Verma's seniority over Dr. Saran was confirmed based on earlier appointment dates. The State Government's selection criteria, considering merit and experience, were deemed appropriate. Respondents 5 and 6 met the qualifications for lecturer appointments, while Dr. Saran lacked sufficient teaching experience at the time. As Dr. Saran was ineligible for the post, his plea for a mandamus was rejected, and the appeals were dismissed without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Oct 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168175