https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168170 A regulated market statute may validly prohibit purchase or sale of notified agricultural produce outside the market area where the restriction is integral to an orderly marketing scheme, protects producers and prevents evasion, and is a reasonable restriction on trade. An enhanced market fee is not invalid merely because exact quid pro quo is absent; a broad and reasonable correlation with market services, facilities and development is sufficient. Paddy and rice are separate notified commodities, so levy may arise at both stages, but Rule 74(1) bars ed collection only when its exemption conditions and proof requirements are satisfied; otherwise the fee remains payable. en-us Tue, 06 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Mar 2015 10:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168170 A regulated market statute may validly prohibit purchase or sale of notified agricultural produce outside the market area where the restriction is integral to an orderly marketing scheme, protects producers and prevents evasion, and is a reasonable restriction on trade. An enhanced market fee is not invalid merely because exact quid pro quo is absent; a broad and reasonable correlation with market services, facilities and development is sufficient. Paddy and rice are separate notified commodities, so levy may arise at both stages, but Rule 74(1) bars ed collection only when its exemption conditions and proof requirements are satisfied; otherwise the fee remains payable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 06 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168170